<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Alvison Hunter's Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.alvisonhunter.com/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.alvisonhunter.com</link>
	<description>a mind is a terrible thing to loose</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 16:14:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How to Deal with Angry Customers</title>
		<link>http://blog.alvisonhunter.com/?p=458</link>
		<comments>http://blog.alvisonhunter.com/?p=458#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 16:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alvisonhunter.com/?p=458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How to Deal with Angry Customers   By JoJo Tabares &#8220;I am tired of YOU PEOPLE sending me this dumb invoice every month!&#8221; Sounds pretty scary, doesn&#8217;t it? You may be thinking&#8230;He sounds angry and I don&#8217;t like talking to angry people. Well, would you believe me if I told you that you could learn [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1><span style="text-decoration: underline;">How to Deal with Angry Customers</span></h1>
<p> </p>
<p>By JoJo Tabares</p>
<p>&#8220;I am tired of YOU PEOPLE sending me this dumb invoice every month!&#8221; Sounds pretty scary, doesn&#8217;t it? You may be thinking&#8230;He sounds angry and I don&#8217;t like talking to angry people.</p>
<p>Well, would you believe me if I told you that you could learn some techniques that would turn this person in to a happy customer? It&#8217;s true!</p>
<p>Many times what an angry person really wants is someone who will listen and do their best to help. They don&#8217;t necessarily need someone to say the &#8220;right thing&#8221; or someone who will &#8220;solve all their problems&#8221;. They just need you to listen and do your level best to help them get what they feel they deserve.</p>
<p>Now we interrupt this communication advice for a message from reality: *BIG DISCLAIMER* Nothing in communicating with human beings is certain because every person is different and their moods change from day to day or even minute by minute.</p>
<p>Nothing works 100% of the time, but these tips will help you increase your chances of creating a connection with this person and enable him walk away feeling that you honestly did you utmost to help him!</p>
<p>1. Don&#8217;t take it personally.</p>
<p>Understand that most angry customers aren&#8217;t angry with you personally, but rather with the situation in which they currently find themselves. They may be frustrated and, until you hear them out, you have no idea why.</p>
<p>2. Let them vent.</p>
<p>Part of being good at customer service is letting the customer feel that he has the floor. Let him tell you the entire story. Take notes if it is long or involved. Only after the customer has felt like he has said his peace should you attempt to solve his problem. Make sure you are actively listening to what he is saying and what he is not saying. Sometimes you can tell more about what would satisfy a customer by paying attention to what your customer didn&#8217;t say or by the nonverbal cues your customer gives out -than you can by the words he chooses.</p>
<p>3. Ask for clarification if there is something that you do not understand.</p>
<p>Better to ask what may seem like a dumb question then to start off on the wrong path to solve his problem. If you begin by answering a question he didn&#8217;t ask, the anger will only intensify. Make sure you know what it is that happened and perhaps what he wants done about it before you begin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.alvisonhunter.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=458</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft’s Windows Azure more dangerous than you think</title>
		<link>http://blog.alvisonhunter.com/?p=424</link>
		<comments>http://blog.alvisonhunter.com/?p=424#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 01:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alvisonhunter.com/?p=424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There’s something afoot. Microsoft is trying to sell the world a service. It’s packaged under the innocuous name: “cloud computing”. But, it’s nothing short of something harmful to people, businesses, and maybe even mankind in general. Microsoft has this vision for the next big thing. To enable that vision, the supportive framework called “Windows Azure”, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There’s something afoot. Microsoft is trying to sell the world a service. It’s packaged under the innocuous name: “cloud computing”. But, it’s nothing short of something harmful to people, businesses, and maybe even mankind in general.</p>
<p>Microsoft has this vision for the next big thing. To enable that vision, the supportive framework called “Windows Azure”, an operating system “for the next 50 years” — according to Microsoft when they introduced it back in October, 2008 — is being created. It is a pervasive tool that Microsoft hopes will be world-wide within a few years. They are already rolling out <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/microsoft/2009458942_microsoftazure13.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: #092b89;">trial runs in Ethiopia</span></a> to school-children.</p>
<p>With Windows Azure, Microsoft is building not only a software platform to allow rapid up/down scaling based on instantaneous global load and need, but also a hardware platform on which to run those software services. Microsoft will be guaranteeing to customers this ability to scale up and down almost immediately through the use of equipment they will own and operate.</p>
<p>From your point of view (as a business owner, government, or an individual with a website), the .NET code you write will be written wherever (possibly on a local machine, possibly also on a development area “sand box” in the cloud), then executed live on Microsoft’s servers. Once tested and debugged, it will be deployed and made accessible to whomever wants to use it across the entire globe, just like the Internet today. The only difference will be, all data and traffic will be handled by Microsoft, stored on their hard drives, and all traffic in and out of your website or business database will be accessible to Microsoft as it will be routed through their Internet backbone.</p>
<p><strong>One Purpose: Control</strong></p>
<p>In short, everything about your website, business or governmental use, including not only its transactions, but also trends, will have been handed over to Microsoft. The full details of what code was running at what time will also be visible to Microsoft. And everything that is of any part of your data interests can be mined behind the scenes, without anyone ever knowing when it was mined, how often it was mined, or for what purposes it was mined.</p>
<p>Microsoft is building a shield of invisibility which could provide them and their agents with unlimited, anytime access to your data. Microsoft will also know what custom code you’ve developed, when various algorithms are running, how often you update your site, how good your <a id="KonaLink0" class="kLink" style="position: static; text-decoration: underline! important;" onclick="adlinkMouseClick(event,this,0);" onmouseover="adlinkMouseOver(event,this,0);" onmouseout="adlinkMouseOut(event,this,0);" href="http://www.geek.com/articles/chips/opinion-microsofts-windows-azure-more-dangerous-than-you-think-20090714/#" target="_top"><span style="font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; color: #0000ff; position: static;"><span class="kLink" style="font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; color: blue! important; font-family: arial,sans-serif; position: relative;">developers</span></span></a> are, and of course there will be the constant threat of repeated, anytime access available for analyzing your data, your business, your government, its <a id="KonaLink1" class="kLink" style="position: static; text-decoration: underline! important;" onclick="adlinkMouseClick(event,this,1);" onmouseover="adlinkMouseOver(event,this,1);" onmouseout="adlinkMouseOut(event,this,1);" href="http://www.geek.com/articles/chips/opinion-microsofts-windows-azure-more-dangerous-than-you-think-20090714/#" target="_top"><span style="font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; color: #0000ff; position: static;"><span class="kLink" style="font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; color: blue! important; font-family: arial,sans-serif; position: relative;">revenue </span><span class="kLink" style="font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; color: blue! important; font-family: arial,sans-serif; position: relative;">potential</span></span></a>, growth patterns, what the customers or citizens are viewing, buying, searching, and everything else.</p>
<p>Microsoft will offer these totally scalable resources for a fee, and it will be a fee commensurate with a modest savings over running the <a id="KonaLink2" class="kLink" style="position: static; text-decoration: underline! important;" onclick="adlinkMouseClick(event,this,2);" onmouseover="adlinkMouseOver(event,this,2);" onmouseout="adlinkMouseOut(event,this,2);" href="http://www.geek.com/articles/chips/opinion-microsofts-windows-azure-more-dangerous-than-you-think-20090714/#" target="_top"><span style="font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; color: #0000ff; position: static;"><span class="kLink" style="font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; color: blue! important; font-family: arial,sans-serif; position: relative;">Internet </span><span class="kLink" style="font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; color: blue! important; font-family: arial,sans-serif; position: relative;">server</span></span></a> equipment yourself. A company or government will actually save money compared to “going it alone” and running their own server system. And this will be its appeal. But we must never lose sight of the real goals here for Microsoft. While they do want to make money, it’s really the control which comes from having full, unfettered access to your data and information they’re after. The irony is, you’ll be paying Microsoft to have total access to your data.</p>
<p><strong>Ask This Question</strong></p>
<p>If you think this isn’t the case, ask yourself this: Would you allow Microsoft to have full access to your hard drive today? Would you allow them access whenever they wanted to examine your data, your site logs, your comments, posts, or whatever other things you do each day with your computer? Would you install a <a id="KonaLink3" class="kLink" style="position: static; text-decoration: underline! important;" onclick="adlinkMouseClick(event,this,3);" onmouseover="adlinkMouseOver(event,this,3);" onmouseout="adlinkMouseOut(event,this,3);" href="http://www.geek.com/articles/chips/opinion-microsofts-windows-azure-more-dangerous-than-you-think-20090714/#" target="_top"><span style="font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; color: #0000ff; position: static;"><span class="kLink" style="font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; color: blue! important; font-family: arial,sans-serif; position: relative;">software </span><span class="kLink" style="font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; color: blue! important; font-family: arial,sans-serif; position: relative;">program</span></span></a> which allows them to, through the Internet, come into your machine today and do an inventory whenever they wanted to? Then why would you allow them to do it with Windows Azure, their global operating system?</p>
<p>While outwardly this design may seem to be of great benefit to companies in terms of cost savings, having scalability and the full support of Microsoft’s development resources behind you, the reality is it’s the first step down the road toward a total lack of control over not only business data, but also potentially your very business, your assets, your freedom, and so much more.</p>
<p>I realize at this point many people are going to jump on the “Rick, this view is extreme” bandwagon. That’s fine. This is an opinion piece, and I am going to lay my cards on the table. I want this to be perfectly clear to everybody. And if I’m wrong in my views, then I welcome open debate. I will take a rebuke. I will stand up front and center and say I’m wrong. But if I’m right, and nobody else is warning you about this… then you owe it to yourself to distribute this opinion.</p>
<p><strong>The Bottom Line</strong></p>
<p>With Windows Azure, Microsoft is building a system which will allow them to monitor every user, every business, every user transaction, (etc.), and all of it in near real-time (and likely in 100% real-time within a few years, once some more of the hardware infrastructure is put into place).</p>
<p>Think about what this could extend to. When you boil everything else away, Microsoft is building a system capable of monitoring not only businesses, but individual user transactions, and ultimately in real-time (probably by the year 2020). This system currently under construction will facilitate the very ability to shut people completely out of the system should they choose to do so — a type of instant “freezing somebody’s assets” so they can neither buy or sell anything that’s part of this global cloud business model. And with what Microsoft is providing to companies in terms of abilities and savings, there will be very few people who are willing to deny themselves access to that profit potential.</p>
<p>Microsoft has promised Windows Azure will be the operating system for the next 50 years. If you think about Microsoft’s track record, how many Microsoft products have you known that have a goal of a lifespan of 50 years? We do not even get full Office compatibility across versions. And Windows <a id="KonaLink4" class="kLink" style="position: static; text-decoration: underline! important;" onclick="adlinkMouseClick(event,this,4);" onmouseover="adlinkMouseOver(event,this,4);" onmouseout="adlinkMouseOut(event,this,4);" href="http://www.geek.com/articles/chips/opinion-microsofts-windows-azure-more-dangerous-than-you-think-20090714/#" target="_top"><span style="font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; color: #0000ff; position: static;"><span class="kLink" style="font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; color: blue! important; font-family: arial,sans-serif; position: relative;">XP </span><span class="kLink" style="font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; color: blue! important; font-family: arial,sans-serif; position: relative;">software</span></span></a> compatibility today is lost in Windows 7 unless you buy a more expensive model, and that’s an OS that came out earlier this very decade.</p>
<p><strong>Danger Ahead</strong></p>
<p>Microsoft’s goals here are not lofty.  They’re not visionary. They’re not even helpful. And they’re not good for business — though from the outside it may appear to be all of that and more. What we are seeing here is the significant threat to our data, and possibly, by extension, us. It’s a mechanism to control every aspect of our daily businesses, governments, and personal <a id="KonaLink5" class="kLink" style="position: static; text-decoration: underline! important;" onclick="adlinkMouseClick(event,this,5);" onmouseover="adlinkMouseOver(event,this,5);" onmouseout="adlinkMouseOut(event,this,5);" href="http://www.geek.com/articles/chips/opinion-microsofts-windows-azure-more-dangerous-than-you-think-20090714/#" target="_top"><span style="font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; color: #0000ff; position: static;"><span class="kLink" style="font-weight: 400; font-size: 13px; color: blue! important; font-family: arial,sans-serif; position: relative;">communications</span></span></a>. We are seeing the creation of an ability to monitor everything, everywhere, simultaneously through distributed processing abilities and a top-down control network, all being directed from Redmond, WA.</p>
<p>With mobile devices evolving today as rapidly as they are, it won’t be long until in such a connected society, nothing will be outside the scope of this system being created. And once it’s entrenched, how much of our sovereign nature will we have lost?</p>
<p>Its appeal will be earnings potential through a wider cloud-enabled business. And for many it will seem a perfectly logic step to walk down that path, a sensible means to grow their business. But it will be a path that leads to their own (and our own) destruction. Look at what history has shown us: Every time an opportunity for new power come into play, wars have broken out because of it. And this coming war will be unlike any other because it will not be an attack with guns, knives, bows and arrows, or even nuclear warheads. This one will enslave all of us into the system through its wonderful traits and abilities, while simultaneously affording Microsoft, with the flip of a switch, to shut out people. Or entire families. Or groups. Or towns. Or states. Or even countries.</p>
<p><strong>Take Heed</strong></p>
<p>I advise everybody who reads this article to exert whatever influence you have over your family’s, company’s and government’s buying practices, and resist any attempt to buy into Microsoft’s Windows Azure, or any other form of cloud-based models offered by Google, IBM or other software giant. They are only after one thing: Everything. And if we allow this to happen, it will be the seal on our own fate we are signing. And we definitely do not want that.</p>
<p><strong>Alternatives, Such As Opera Unite</strong></p>
<p>And note also, for an alternative to this Microsoft-controlled cloud-computing future, that companies like Opera are creating their <a href="http://www.geek.com/articles/news/opera-moves-data-sharing-opera-unite-20090616/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #092b89;">Opera Unite</span></a>, which will be a native feature of Opera 10 due out later this year. It’s a system similar to cloud-computing, but one which operates on a person-by-person basis, allowing all of us to have our own website through the regular Internet simply by being online and using the Opera web browser (no complex servers to setup or maintain). We are responsible for storing and maintaining our data, not some remote, corporate system. And I have no doubts other similar efforts will follow.</p>
<p>I advise everybody to encourage those kinds of efforts, and not a centralized, running-on-corporate-owned-servers model. Your grandchildren will thank you for it.</p>
<p><!-- sphereit end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.alvisonhunter.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=424</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Respond to Angry Customers</title>
		<link>http://blog.alvisonhunter.com/?p=420</link>
		<comments>http://blog.alvisonhunter.com/?p=420#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 01:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alvisonhunter.com/?p=420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ten powerful steps to diffuse angry customers, address the issues and sustain customer loyalty by John Mehrmann 1. Assume that the Customer has a Right to be Angry Nobody makes mistakes on purpose, but they do happen. If you are working in a call center, behind a counter or in any capacity that directly interfaces [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>
<p><div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 330px"><img title="Angry Customer" src="http://www.trainingabc.com/xcart/files/t_16623.jpg" alt="Angry Customer" width="320" height="240" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Angry Customer</p></div></h1>
<p align="center"><strong>Ten powerful steps to diffuse angry customers,<br />
address the issues and sustain customer loyalty</strong></p>
<p align="center">by John Mehrmann</p>
<p><strong>1. Assume that the Customer has a Right to be Angry<br />
</strong>Nobody makes mistakes on purpose, but they do happen. If you are working in  a call center, behind a counter or in any capacity that directly interfaces with  customers then you are going to encounter an irate customer at some time. The  most common response is to evaluate the merit of the complaint while your are  listening to it. Try to curb that common response and replace it with the  assumption that the customer has a right to be angry, even before you know the  details.</p>
<p>Perhaps the customer feels betrayed because the product or services did not meet  expectations. The customer may be angry because he or she made incorrect  assumptions that led to improper expectations. The customer may be angry because  of previous experiences, previous contacts with your company or simply because  the problem occurred at a very inconvenient time in the customer schedule.  Regardless of the circumstances, acknowledge the customer has the privilege to  be irate. Listen carefully to how the anger is expressed so you can find the  root cause of the emotion.</p>
<p><strong>2. Listen to Emotion without Emotion<br />
</strong>Listen to the inflections and emphasis that the customer places on specific  topics to identify the emotional catalyst. Listen to the emotion as well as the  words. This will help you to identify the specific item or items that need  primary attention. Resolving a technical issue may be only partially effective  if it does not also address the customer emotional concerns. It may not be  possible to completely resolve the emotional distress, but it is appropriate to  acknowledge it.</p>
<p>Imagine that a customer experienced a technical malfunction when downloading  digital images of a special event, wedding or family vacation. The technical  issue may be related to hardware or software, but the emotional distress is  related to the risk of losing precious memories. While it is necessary to  correct the technical issue, it is also appropriate to acknowledge the risks  that create the emotional response. Try to preserve the precious memories or at  least explain why they can not be retrieved, but do not ignore the emotional  catalyst.</p>
<p>Do not respond with emotion. Remember that the customer anger is not directed  at you personally, even if the customer language is directed at you. If the  customer language is attacking and borderline abusive, it is because the  customer is looking for acknowledgement and response to the emotional distress  as well as the technical or administrative issues. It may be necessary to  repeatedly acknowledge the customer emotion to diffuse the situation and  reassure the customer that you are attentive to the importance of the emotional  distress as well as the technical issue.</p>
<p><strong>3. Be Patient<br />
</strong>Customer conversations come in waves. When the customer is at the peak of  expressing anger, sorrow or distress, be patient and listen. It is not effective  to interrupt the customer when he or she is venting combustible sentiments. It  is like pouring gasoline on a raging fire. Rather, wait for the waves of emotion  to recede and then use that opportunity to interject with reassuring comments.</p>
<p>Sometime the customer anger will erupt and return like another set of waves.  When that happens, be patient and wait for the customer to run out of gas before  you approach the fire again. Reiterate your compassion, acknowledge the customer  right to be angry and the catalyst for the emotional distress. Takes quiet deep  breaths and wait patiently for your turn to speak.</p>
<p><strong>4. Speak Softly<br />
</strong>If you encounter a loud and abusive customer, respond by speaking softly and  with a very steady tone. If you try to shout over the customer or interrupt,  then the customer will concentrate on the verbal battle for attention and will  not pay attention to the importance of your message. If you want your message to  be heard, wait for a pause in the customer tirade. Silence is your golden cue  that it is time to speak your important message in a soft voice. Eventually the  customer will have to lower his or her voice to hear what you are saying.</p>
<p>Even though it may seem that the customer does not care about what you have  to say at first, remember that the customer approached you for resolution. The  customer may have built up a considerable amount of emotion before reaching you,  but ultimately the customer does want your advice and assistance to resolve the  problem. Once the customer remembers why he or she contacted you, the customer  will be receptive to your soft spoken conversation.</p>
<p><strong>5. Reiterate<br />
</strong>Make sure that you are addressing the technical, administrative and  emotional aspects of the customer concerns. After you have listened carefully to  the customer, reiterate the priorities that you believe that you heard from the  customer perspective. This will assure that you are focused on the appropriate  issues and reassure the customer that you are concentrating on the proper  priorities.</p>
<p>Use a soft, firm and inquisitive voice. Ask the customer to confirm that you  have restated the facts and priorities accurately, then write them down.</p>
<p><strong>6. Own the Problem<br />
</strong>It does not matter who created the problem or what transpired before the  customer got to you. Tell the customer that you own the problem and will apply  your personal effort to achieve results.</p>
<p>Sometimes it may be tempting to distance yourself from the problem by stating  that you are not responsible for it, that another department will need to handle  it, or that you are just a messenger. Put that temptation in a can and put a lid  on it. Expressing that you do not have ownership of the problem or the potential  resolution gives the customer a feeling of being adrift and powerless. if the  customer senses that he or she is communicating with someone who is powerless,  it will create yet another reason to be frustrated and angry.</p>
<p>Even if you do need to work with other departments, get manager approval or  coordinate some other type of response, inform the customer that you will  personally take the matter into your own hands and follow-up on the issues. The  customer does not know your company, your policies or your procedures. The  customer will never be able to navigate the requirements, restrictions or  resolution with the same knowledge and experience as you. Reassure the customer  that you will use your knowledge and experience to coordinate the best possible  resolution, even if you need to get the assistance of other parties to achieve  it.</p>
<p><strong>7. Place the Customer First, Problem Second<br />
</strong>In most cases there are two conflicting issues that occur simultaneously  when dealing with irate customers. There first issue is the customer emotional  distress. The second is the technical or administrative issue that caused the  emotional distress. While it may seem logical to focus first on the technical or  administrative issue that cause the emotional distress, it is important to  acknowledge the customer anger first and the technical issue second.</p>
<p>Resolving the technical issue may or may not fully resolve the root cause of  the customer distress. Acknowledge the customer concerns first and try to calm  down the customer enough to help you concentrate on the technical or  administrative problems. Sometimes the technical problem may require much more  attention because it may impact other customers. Acknowledge the individual  customer emotion first, resolve the specific customer technical issue second and  reserve addressing any bigger issues as independent activity.</p>
<p><strong>8. Triage<br />
</strong>Once you have an opportunity to focus on technical and administrative  issues, triage the root cause of the problems to determine what went wrong.  Analyze the problem and provide corrective measures or detailed information in  an effort to avoid duplicating the problem with other customers. It may be  necessary to obtain some additional information from your customer to accurately  analyze the root cause of the problem.</p>
<p><strong>9. Correct the Issue<br />
</strong>Correct the issue for the specific customer and also look for long term  corrective measures. It may not be feasible to give your customer a guarantee  that the correction will resolve all problems permanently, but it may be  appropriate to reassure the customer that you will be available to assist in the  event that another different problem should occur again. Demonstrate your  confidence that this specific problem is resolved and is not expected to  reoccur. Demonstrate your attention to the specific customer by reiterating  original concerns and actions that you took to correct the issue.</p>
<p><strong>10. Follow Up<br />
</strong>When possible, follow-up with the customer after sufficient time has elapsed  to demonstrate that the corrective action has been effective. A phone call or a  personalized postcard demonstrates individual attention and acknowledgement.  Demonstrating compassion and attentiveness thirty days after a problem has been  resolved is a powerful message to show that you really do care about the  individual customer. This follow-up after the anger has subsided and the  corrective action has been demonstrated as effective may be enough to retain  loyal customers and earn a few new ones.</p>
<p><strong>Words of Wisdom </strong></p>
<p><em>&#8220;You can&#8217;t teach someone to care.&#8221;<br />
</em>- Art Sakaguchi</p>
<p><em>&#8220;The crisis of yesterday is the joke of tomorrow.&#8221;<br />
</em>- H G Wells</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Speak when you are angry and you&#8217;ll give the best speech that you will  ever regret.&#8221;<br />
</em>- Lawrence J Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.alvisonhunter.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=420</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Future of Linux</title>
		<link>http://blog.alvisonhunter.com/?p=415</link>
		<comments>http://blog.alvisonhunter.com/?p=415#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 02:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alvisonhunter.com/?p=415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Future of Linux was set up as a panel discussion and was held at the Santa Clara Convention Center (in the heart of Silicon Valley) on the evening of July 14, 1998. It was hosted by Taos Mountain and the Silicon Valley Linux Users Group (SVLUG), and was sponsored by them, Intel, Red Hat, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="emphasis"><em>The Future of Linux</em></span> was set up as a panel discussion and was held at the Santa Clara Convention Center (in the heart of Silicon Valley) on the evening of July 14, 1998. It was hosted by Taos Mountain and the Silicon Valley Linux Users Group (SVLUG), and was sponsored by them, Intel, Red Hat, <em>Linux Journal</em> and VA Research. Apparently it was considerably more popular than Taos expected; people stood in line for up to an hour to register, and the free food and free VA Research/Linux T-shirts ran out. I didn&#8217;t get a firm count, but Taos said 850 people had returned their RSVP, and my estimate is 700 to 900 attended.</p>
<div class="mediaobject"><img src="http://www.linuxjournal.com/files/linuxjournal.com/linuxjournal/articles/031/3108/3108f2.png" alt="" /></p>
<div class="caption">
<p>Linus Torvalds and the Panel</p></div>
</div>
<p>The panel was a distinguished group: Jeremy Allison, one of the lead Samba developers; Larry Augustin, founder of VA Research and member of the Linux International Board of Directors; Robert Hart, from Red Hat Software; Sunil Saxena, from Intel&#8217;s UNIX Performance Lab; and, of course, The Man himself, Linus Torvalds. (While I know there are a lot of Linux fans who like to pronounce “Linux” with a long “i” sound (LYE-nucks), and despite the fact that Linus himself doesn&#8217;t care how anyone else pronounces it, he unquestionably did so with a short “i” as in “linen” (LINN-ucks). In Swedish he presumably still pronounces it the third way, roughly “LEE-nooks.”) The discussion was moderated by Michael Masterson of Taos, who traded off questioning duties with Phil Hughes, all-around hairy guy and publisher of <em>Linux Journal</em>.</p>
<div class="mediaobject"><img src="http://www.linuxjournal.com/files/linuxjournal.com/linuxjournal/articles/031/3108/3108f5.png" alt="" /></div>
<div class="mediaobject"><img src="http://www.linuxjournal.com/files/linuxjournal.com/linuxjournal/articles/031/3108/3108f6.png" alt="" /></div>
<div class="mediaobject"><img src="http://www.linuxjournal.com/files/linuxjournal.com/linuxjournal/articles/031/3108/3108f8.png" alt="" /></div>
<p>Linus Torvalds responds to a question from the audience. Ben Spade, president of the Silicon Valley Linux User Group, serves as microphone wrangler.</p>
<p>I did not have a tape recorder, so answers are paraphrases of what was actually said. [<span class="emphasis"><em>Comments in square brackets are my personal asides.</em></span>]</p>
<div class="simplesect" lang="en">
<div class="titlepage"><a name="N0xa50890.0xb45618"></a>Phil Hughes&#8217; Questions</div>
<p>1. How much bigger will the Linux market be in 2000?</p>
<div class="itemizedlist">
<ul type="disc">
<li>Jeremy Allison said 20% to 25% of shipping Intel systems will have Linux pre-installed.</li>
<li>Linus Torvalds said that he&#8217;s always been bad at predicting things and basically weaseled out of answering the question.</li>
<li>Sunil Saxena also declined to speculate.</li>
<li>Larry Augustin said that Linux would be the #1 UNIX by 2000.</li>
<li>Robert Hart mentioned the Datapro report that showed only two operating systems increased their corporate market share in 1997; Linux was one of them. He said the doubling time was 12 months, which would imply between 20 million and 40 million Linux users; “I&#8217;ll be surprised if we don&#8217;t go beyond that.”</li>
</ul>
</div>
<p>2. World domination: how much longer? [in reference to Linus' rather famous stated goal in his .sig or .plan or something]</p>
<p>Linus Torvalds: “That used to be a joke&#8230; [<span class="emphasis"><em>much laughter</em></span>] &#8230;and it&#8217;s becoming less and less so.” He said his ego hopes it will happen in five to ten years; but more realistically, he hopes that in five to ten years no one dominates the industry.</p>
<p>3. What is Samba&#8217;s role in Linux&#8217;s acceptance?</p>
<p>Jeremy Allison first asked for a show of hands; it appeared that roughly 40% of the audience used Samba. Then he gave the short answer to the question: Samba “essentially allows people to remove NT servers.” He noted that SGI is officially adopting Samba [<span class="emphasis"><em>recall that they, like HP, are now selling NT systems as the low end of their product line</em></span>] and that “some crazy folks are running it straight off of CDs with 200 users” (mostly universities who “do not want NT”). By the end of the year, he hopes that Samba will be able to completely replace all primary NT Server functions.</p>
<p>4. Open Source is obviously just another fad—isn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>Larry Augustin was the first to disagree; he said that Open Source is here to stay—for example, it allows a company like Netscape to compete on its own terms with Microsoft, not on Microsoft&#8217;s terms. It also supports a Darwinian model: if one vendor&#8217;s support is lacking, you&#8217;ve got the source and can take your money (and business) elsewhere. That&#8217;s not possible with the closed-source model epitomized by Microsoft.</p>
<p>Robert Hart expanded on that point: it&#8217;s all about control. If you need a new feature or bug fix or other customization, you can simply hire someone to do it for you. “You don&#8217;t need anyone&#8217;s permission; just do it!” I believe he related an example of a company with a large application that was in dire need of a bug fix; they were willing to spend essentially any amount of money or manpower to get the thing working, but their vendor was unresponsive and they had no real alternatives.</p>
<p>Jeremy Allison claimed that he was fundamentally “a lazy programmer” and that the Open Source model is a way of letting users do the work [<span class="emphasis"><em>more laughter</em></span>]. He mentioned that some incredible Samba patches occasionally turn up in his e-mail—often oddball customizations useful to only a few people, but to them they&#8217;re extremely useful. “Imagine asking Microsoft to do a custom NT Server for your site.”</p>
<p>5. What will be the long-term effects on Linux of Microsoft&#8217;s recent win against Netscape (i.e., bundling MSIE in Win98)?</p>
<p>Linus Torvalds dismissed the Department of Justice and the U.S. legal system as important factors in Linux&#8217;s future; “the only thing that will matter is the market.” In fact, he claimed it&#8217;s an advantage since there are many companies who find it hard to compete, when Microsoft sees what they&#8217;re doing and simply incorporates similar technology directly into the OS. In the Linux arena they can find a niche and compete (echoing Larry&#8217;s comments above), as Corel has, for example. “That&#8217;s one reason why, in the end, a monopoly just doesn&#8217;t work. [<span class="emphasis"><em>pause</em></span>] Maybe that&#8217;s just me&#8230;”</p>
<p>6. What do we need to do to get applications (such as from Adobe and Quark, which are the only non-Linux applications used by <em>Linux Journal</em>), ported to Linux?</p>
<p>Robert Hart said there are just two things: let them know you want Linux ports, and show them there&#8217;s profit to be made.</p>
<p>Larry Augustin related an article seen on Slashdot earlier in the day about Informix&#8217;s unannounced Linux port and said the key is to tell vendors, “If you port it to Linux, we will buy it.” [<span class="emphasis"><em>Three days later, Slashdot and InfoWorld Electric reported a sudden reversal of plans at Oracle: they will be porting Oracle 8 to Linux after all. In fact, they say they've had it running internally for a while already. See also InfoWorld Electric's article on Informix's official Linux announcement, made on July 22.</em></span>]</p>
<p>7. With regard to the Linux Standard Base (a standard for base-level compatibility across Linux distributions): Red Hat and Debian&#8217;s standard package formats, Red Hat&#8217;s early adoption of glibc vs. everyone else, etc., are we doing this right? Are there too many Linux “standards”?</p>
<p>Robert Hart had three points in response. First, a lot of discussion goes on between the various distribution makers, precisely for the purpose of avoiding fragmentation. Second, we have a danger of stultifying and crushing the rapid pace of development and the incredible customization choices available to users if we have too much rigidity and standardization. Third, to the other distributions: “Please get with it—glibc is the only actively maintained C library.”</p>
<p>Larry Augustin countered that he&#8217;s seen a lot of users who, when they upgraded to Red Hat 5.x, found that “everything broke”. [<span class="emphasis"><em>Thanks to Jason Riedy for the reminder that just installing the older libc 5.4.x somewhere in the library path isn't sufficient; most shared libraries used by older applications need to be duplicated, as was the case in the changeover from a.out to ELF binaries a couple of years ago.</em></span>] “You&#8217;re in the big time now. Some things (like Informix) users can&#8217;t simply recompile—try to make things easier for people and remain compatible.”</p>
<p>8. What if Microsoft plays the Linux game? For example, Open Windows 99 or Internet Explorer for Linux?</p>
<p>Linus Torvalds first noted that he&#8217;s working at a company [<span class="emphasis"><em>Transmeta</em></span>] whose product won&#8217;t be available on the Internet. He went on to say that he has a lot of respect for Microsoft&#8217;s PR machine, and “let&#8217;s hope they do.”</p>
<p>Jeremy Allison apparently interpreted “Open Windows 99” as a hypothetical Microsoft release based on Linux, and said he would welcome MS Linux—the GNU General Public License (GPL) limits abuse. “If they change it, we&#8217;d get the source code,” to which Linus muttered, “We could fix it, too.” [<span class="emphasis"><em>much applause and laughter</em></span>]</p>
<p>9. NASA, NIST, the U.S. Postal Service, the IRS all use Linux—is the U.S. Government the first step toward world domination?</p>
<p>Linus Torvalds: “I hadn&#8217;t really thought of that, but now that you&#8217;ve planted the idea&#8230;” [<span class="emphasis"><em>more chuckles</em></span>]</div>
<div class="simplesect" lang="en">
<div class="titlepage"><a name="N0xa50890.0xb3cee0"></a>Prepared Question #1</div>
<p>Is Linux superior, comparable, or inferior to commercial operating systems? [or something like that]</p>
<p><span class="bold"><strong>Jeremy Allison (Samba)</strong></span>: [<span class="emphasis"><em>I think he was one of the panelists who made the comment that “Linux is a commercial OS”; his answer amounted to choice #1:</em></span>]</p>
<p>Linux is very standards-compliant (e.g., Posix); a good approach is to develop first on Linux, then port to a proprietary UNIX system. For example, Samba has three separate pieces of code to deal with some aspect of file-system stuff; Linux supports all three interfaces, so they just choose the one that runs the fastest.</p>
<p>He gave a wish list of improvements he&#8217;d like to see, though: 64-bit file-system support (“for those 20GB Exchange databases”); access control list (ACL) support; asynchronous I/O support; NFS file-locking and improved performance [<span class="emphasis"><em>amen to that</em></span>]; and a thread model like Solaris.</p>
<p>He noted that Linux has current support for more platforms than any other OS: x86, SPARC, Alpha, Power PC, 68k, etc. Bugs are fixed the fastest, especially security leaks.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s been a Linux “iBCS” module to support SCO UNIX binaries for a couple of years; at this year&#8217;s USENIX, SCO announced (and demoed) a module to run Linux applications.</p>
<p><span class="bold"><strong>Larry Augustin (VA Research)</strong></span>: His answer was “yes”. Linux is not (yet) as far along as Solaris in supporting 64-way symmetric multi-processing (SMP). [<span class="emphasis"><em>I thought the SPARC-based Fujitsu AP1000+ on which David S. Miller reported success last year was a big SMP box, but as Jason Riedy pointed out, it's a distributed-memory multi-computer similar to the Connection Machine CM5.</em></span>]</p>
<p>In his slides of user ratings (Datapro survey, which was mentioned several times during the evening), Linux was not only the overall winner in a field of half a dozen operating systems (Windows NT placed last), it also won in all but two categories—and only Digital UNIX was rated higher in those two (availability and performance). The other categories included reliability, technical support, price, etc.</p>
<p><span class="bold"><strong>Robert Hart (Red Hat)</strong></span>: Linux is a commercial operating system. It is sold and supported commercially (Red Hat, Caldera and others); it is used commercially; its only difference is that the source code is freely available.</p>
<p>Key “commercial OS” features like a journaling file system and database access that bypasses the file system layer are coming very soon.</p>
<p>Many of Red Hat&#8217;s users (more with every release) have never installed an OS, which means Red Hat has to “reverse engineer” their hardware configuration.</p>
<p>Why is Linux not ubiquitous? It&#8217;s still not suitable for everyone (he mentioned his “75-year-old mum”), and although there are good office applications for Linux, there aren&#8217;t any killer ones yet. (There were follow-ups to the suitability comment by some of the other panelists.)</p>
<p><span class="bold"><strong>Sunil Saxena (Intel)</strong></span>: He presented some slides that amounted to a “yes” response as well.</p>
<p>Strengths: Linux is becoming the OS of choice of ISPs; on 32-bit Intel systems, Linux has broader device-driver support than any other UNIX (e.g., SCO, Solaris/x86, etc.); its Open Source model means that updates, patches and bug fixes happen in “Internet time.”</p>
<p>Weaknesses: SMP support and scalability is still evolving (although he noted that Leonard Zubkoff did a successful two-day port to the brand-new, four-way Pentium II Xeon system that Intel and VA Research showed off); good server management is missing (e.g., using a remote serial line or modem to update things, including the BIOS); drivers for high-end hardware tend to be lacking; and large-memory support (say, multi-gigabyte range) isn&#8217;t there.</p>
<p>Making it better: he said (and repeated several times throughout the evening) that Intel really wants to help and do more to support Linux, and in particular, they see the following as likely areas of collaboration:</p>
<div class="itemizedlist">
<ul type="disc">
<li>more than 4-way SMP (serious scalability, at least 16 to 32 processors)</li>
<li>drivers for high-end platforms</li>
<li>direct server control and management</li>
<li>support for PII features such as 36-bit addressing (up to 64 GB of RAM), enhanced system calls and save/restore, MMX instructions, the page attribute table, and on-chip performance monitors</li>
</ul>
</div>
<p><span class="bold"><strong>Linus Torvalds</strong></span>: He started off with a comment to the effect of, “What can I say? I came to listen to the others.”</p>
<p>He noted that Linux originally was a one-person OS; it was never intended to be useful to others. He also pointed out that it has just shown up on the list of the world&#8217;s most powerful supercomputers (in a cluster design); he thought it made #316. [<span class="emphasis"><em>Actually #315 in the June 1998 list—see the press release for details.</em></span>] At the other end of the spectrum, it&#8217;s being ported to Palm Pilots. “I don&#8217;t see that [<span class="emphasis"><em>its broad portability and usefulness</em></span>] ending any time soon.”</p>
<p>He responded to a couple of Sunil&#8217;s comments:</p>
<div class="itemizedlist">
<ul type="disc">
<li>36-bit addressing on Intel: “We&#8217;ve been doing that on Alpha for awhile.”</li>
<li>Page Attribute Table: he didn&#8217;t know about Intel&#8217;s implementation but said that he&#8217;d suggested it to an Intel engineer a few years ago; “I don&#8217;t know if they did it right, but if so, I&#8217;ll be happy to use it.”</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<div class="simplesect" lang="en">
<div class="titlepage"><a name="N0xa50890.0xb3de58"></a>Prepared Question #2</div>
<p>Where will Linux be in two to three years?</p>
<p><span class="bold"><strong>Sunil Saxena</strong></span>: “It&#8217;s all on my foil right here.” Among Internets/Intranets/ISPs, Linux will continue to grow, especially in corporate America; we&#8217;ll see continued adoption.</p>
<p>There will be new growth in the areas of E-commerce and business-to-business Internet EDI (electronic data interchange).</p>
<p>It will start showing up in all sorts of Internet appliances, including wearable computers, video-conferencing systems, etc.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll see 64-bit Linux on the IA-64 (Merced).</p>
<p>Linux will move into the data center via high-availability clusters and 16- to 32-way SMP systems.</p>
<p>Other spiffy features like I2O, hot swap, serial-based server management and control, etc., will be supported.</p>
<p>Linux developers will be granted early access and increased access to specs and Intel engineers.</p>
<p>“Please come talk to us and tell us what we can do.”</p>
<p><span class="bold"><strong>Larry Augustin</strong></span>: One big prediction: kernel 2.2 will be released within three years (“and that&#8217;s pushing it”). [<span class="emphasis"><em>much laughter</em></span>]</p>
<p>He also took the opportunity to thank Leonard Zubkoff for the four-way Xeon port being demoed by VA Research in the rear. Apparently he modified (added?) 20 lines of code at the last minute without even having all of the source there.</p>
<p><span class="bold"><strong>Robert Hart</strong></span>: Two to three years is an eternity for Linux—even a week is a long time.</p>
<p>People are lazy, and laziness leads to creativity, which means great improvements for Linux.</p>
<p>He again noted that it&#8217;s the only non-MS operating system to gain market share and that it&#8217;s being actively courted by large vendors such as Intel. He also noted that it&#8217;s generating strong media interest, and not only that, but the reporting is generally both accurate and useful. (He thanked the representatives of the press in the audience.)</p>
<div class="mediaobject"><img src="http://www.linuxjournal.com/files/linuxjournal.com/linuxjournal/articles/031/3108/3108fb.png" alt="" /></p>
<div class="caption">
<p>All photographs used with this article are by Jim Howell, courtesy of Taos Mountain.</p></div>
</div>
<p>There will be a strong showing of easy-to-use applications.</p>
<p>Linux will be the dominant server platform, not just on Intel but across all platforms. I believe he mentioned “64-bit, 4-way Merced,” too.</p>
<p>He mentioned that it was Bastille Day and recalled how, in 1788 and 1789, the people rose up and stormed the IT department and gave freedom to oppressed machines. “They even executed some people.” But he disputed his own comparison and said that Linux isn&#8217;t so much a revolution as an evolution; it didn&#8217;t happen just once.</p>
<p>He concluded by predicting that in two to three years, Linux will be “very nearly everywhere”.</p>
<p><span class="bold"><strong>Linus Torvalds</strong></span>: “I&#8217;m really bad at predictions.” For example, a few years ago when he was asked about SMP support, his reaction was, “I don&#8217;t know, it&#8217;s too expensive”; he said he didn&#8217;t care much about it and didn&#8217;t find it interesting. But for the last year he&#8217;s worked almost exclusively on SMP.</p>
<p>2.2 will be out by then. [<span class="emphasis"><em>much more laughter</em></span>]</p>
<p>The kernel is really just a vessel for what one can do; he claimed that it was inappropriate to ask him such a question—“what&#8217;s really exciting is applications” (and the journaling file system is “slightly exciting”).</p>
<p>Servers will be big. [Do we sense a theme here?]</p>
<p>The interesting part will be “pretty” applications that traditionally haven&#8217;t been UNIX-based.</p>
<p><span class="bold"><strong>Jeremy Allison</strong></span>: He used to keep track of every minor release of every piece of free software; these days, no one can do so for even 10% of it, and there will be some incredibly cool things in that other 90%.</p>
<p>Linux will be a “killer server platform.”</p>
<p>Everyone at Cisco Systems uses Linux every time they print, whether they know it or not. [<span class="emphasis"><em>See the c.o.l.a announcement for details about the printer-administration tool used at Cisco, and the article about Cisco in this issue.</em></span>]</p>
<p>At least one major PC vendor will start shipping PCs with Linux pre-installed. (If not, Robert will start such a company.)</p>
<p>With regard to applications, vendors are already “not as greedy” as they&#8217;ve traditionally been on UNIX systems; Linux applications are priced similarly to Wintel applications, not five times more. Linux will be on the desktop, and one will be able to buy almost any application for Linux.</p>
<p>Again, he predicted that Linux will be installed on 20% to 25% of shipping Intel systems.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.linuxjournal.com/files/linuxjournal.com/linuxjournal/articles/031/3108/3108s1.html">Resources</a></div>
<div class="authorblurb">
<p><span class="bold"><strong>Greg Roelofs</strong></span> escaped from the University of           Chicago with a degree in astrophysics and fled screaming to Silicon           Valley, where he now does outrageously cool graphics, 3D and           compression stuff for Philips Research. He is a member of Info-ZIP           and the PNG group. He can be reached by e-mail at <a href="mailto:newt@pobox.com">newt@pobox.com</a> or           on the web at <a href="http://pobox.com/%7Enewt/">pobox.com/~newt/</a>.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.alvisonhunter.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=415</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Software gratuito para gestionar un negocio</title>
		<link>http://blog.alvisonhunter.com/?p=410</link>
		<comments>http://blog.alvisonhunter.com/?p=410#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 02:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alvisonhunter.com/?p=410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hoy en día, prácticamente todas las gestiones de una empresa, oficina o comercio se hacen con un ordenador y programas especializados. Sin embargo, también es posible descargar de internet software de gestión empresarial gratuito, como los programas ContaLinex y FacturLinex. 25 Jun 2004 &#124; LA OPINIÓN, EEUU Lo cierto es que cualquier empresa, por pequeña [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoy en día, prácticamente todas las gestiones de una empresa, oficina o comercio se hacen con un ordenador y programas especializados. Sin embargo, también es posible descargar de internet software de gestión empresarial gratuito, como los programas ContaLinex y FacturLinex.</p>
<div class="sm news">25 Jun 2004 | <strong>LA OPINIÓN, EEUU</strong></div>
<p><img class="news-image" style="float: right;" src="http://www.laflecha.net/cache/thumbnails/k/250x220//storage/images/3/3/linux_001%283%29.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<div class="content-text"><sup>L</sup>o cierto es que cualquier empresa, por pequeña que sea, debe invertir periódicamente una cantidad creciente en comprar licencias de software que le permitan utilizar legalmente ciertos programas.</p>
<p>Entre otros, los programas de software como procesadores de textos, hojas de cálculo, o software para la gestión de facturas se han convertido en imprescindibles para cualquier negocio.</p>
<p>Esas licencias que se deben abonar son el pago a las firmas que han desarrollado los programas que son de su propiedad. Sin embargo, a través de internet es posible acceder a diversos programas totalmente gratuitos, desarrollados bajo la filosofía del Software Libre para su uso en las pequeñas y medianas empresas, que pueden suponer un importante ahorro y por lo tanto una ayuda a su rentabilidad.</p>
<p>El portal GnuLinex.net (<a href="http://www.gnulinex.net/">www.gnulinex.net</a>) es una de estas direcciones donde cualquier interesado puede descargar gratuitamente programas para la gestión de facturas, seguimiento de pedidos, ingresos, ventas, pagos&#8230; todo gratis y en español.</p>
<p>Si se desea adaptar esos programas a las necesidades específicas de una empresa, el usuario tiene permiso de realizarlo con total libertad, ya que ésta es la filosofía del Software Libre.</p>
<p>Estas modificaciones no suelen ser posibles cuando uno paga una licencia de software propietario, ya que éste no suele dar autorización para acceder al código del programa.</p>
<p><strong>Pequeña y mediana empresa</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;El diseño de este conjunto de programas se basa en la idea de proyectar los beneficios del software libre a la pequeña y mediana empresa con el fin de poner a su disposición un sistema de gestión de su actividad abierto y adaptable a las necesidades particulares con un costo mínimo&#8221;, explicó a <em>La Opinión</em> Luis Millán, consejero de Tecnología del gobierno regional español de Extremadura, e impulsor de la iniciativa GnuLinez.org.</p>
<p>En opinión del responsable político del proyecto, ofrecer de forma gratuita estos programas de gestión empresarial para pequeñas y medianas empresas también genera puestos de trabajo, ya que impulsa el desarrollo del sector de las nuevas tecnologías más centrado en el desarrollo y adaptación de sistemas operativos abiertos que en la creación y comercialización de software propietario, con escasos beneficios en un mercado que limita mucho las posibilidades de este tipo de empresas.</p>
<p>&#8220;Esta actuación pretende que las pequeñas y medianas empresas (pymes) que utilizan la tecnología de la información y la comunicación como herramienta una zapatería, estanco, tienda de ropa, etc. vean que es más práctico y barato para ellas contratar un servicio de mantenimiento del software que alquilar una licencia o piratear un programa informático. Nuestro objetivo es fomentar esa cultura: contratar el servicio garantiza lo importante, que tu software de empresa funcione, creando así demanda entre las pymes no tecnológicas a las que sí lo son&#8221;.</p>
<p><strong>Para todos</strong></p>
<p>Además, la oferta LinEx está abierta a todos los usuarios del mundo. Aunque se ha desarrollado en la región española de Extremadura, una de las más pobres de la Unión Europea, &#8220;el espíritu del proyecto se basa en la idea de compartir el conocimiento y este concepto conlleva el hecho de ofrecer lo que se ha creado aquí para que pueda ser utilizado por los interesados, mejorado en la medida que se considere necesario, una mejora que redundará en las potencialidades del propio sistema y que, en definitiva, nos beneficiará a todos&#8221;.</p>
<p>El paquete de programas recientemente lanzado, Gestión LinEx, incluye TPV (Terminal Punto de Venta), gestión de almacén, facturación, contabilidad, control de tallas y colores, importación de datos de otras aplicaciones, entre otras funciones.</p>
<p>Al ser un código abierto, cualquier usuario, informático o propietario de un negocio puede modificarlo libremente para adaptarlo a sus necesidades concretas o pedirle a una empresa que se lo adapte.</p>
<p>Contalinex y Gestión LinEx ya han sido descargados por más de cinco mil pequeñas empresas en todo el mundo.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.alvisonhunter.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=410</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Linus Torvalds reconoce que &#8220;Windows 7 es mejor que Vista&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blog.alvisonhunter.com/?p=399</link>
		<comments>http://blog.alvisonhunter.com/?p=399#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alvisonhunter.com/?p=399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sin embargo, Linus Torvalds adjudicó esa mejora a una &#8220;movida publicitaria&#8221; del gigante del software mundial. 04 Feb 2009 &#124; INFOBAE Torvalds mantuvo una entrevista con ComputerWorld y allí habló sobre el sucesor del Windows Vista. &#8220;El hecho de que Windows 7 sea mejor que Vista dice mucho. Microsoft tendrá una enorme ventaja publicitaria, debido [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="summary">
<div class="top-right">
<div class="bottom-left">
<div class="bottom-right">
<div class="content-text" style="overflow: hidden;">
<p>Sin embargo, Linus Torvalds adjudicó esa mejora a una &#8220;movida publicitaria&#8221; del gigante del software mundial.</p></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="sm news">04 Feb 2009 | <strong>INFOBAE</strong></div>
<p><img class="news-image" style="float: right;" src="http://www.laflecha.net/cache/thumbnails/k/250x220/storage/news/0027/407_torvalds.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<div class="content-text"><sup>T</sup>orvalds mantuvo una entrevista con <em>ComputerWorld</em> y allí habló sobre el sucesor del Windows Vista.</p>
<p>&#8220;El hecho de que Windows 7 sea mejor que Vista dice mucho. Microsoft tendrá una enorme ventaja publicitaria, debido a que los consumidores compararán el producto con Vista, concluyendo que es bueno. ¿Quizás Microsoft lo hizo a propósito?&#8221;, se preguntó Torvalds.</p>
<p>Siguiendo con su teoría, se refirió al tiempo de desarrollo del Vista, el cual, según su visión, tomó demasiado tiempo: &#8220;Puede suponerse que tienen un ciclo de desarrollo de dos años, que creo es excesivo&#8221;.</p>
<p>El considerado padre de Linux agregó que seis meses es un tiempo adecuado para una versión de ese sistema operativo. Incluso, una por año puede ser viable.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.alvisonhunter.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=399</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
